Classical Guitar Players - Are Nails Necessary?

Every once in a while I go back and practice some classical stuff on my cheap Nylon string, but I never stay consistent enough with it for my fingerpicking to really develop. But I also keep my nails short by choice. Is it possible to play fingerpicking well on a nylon without having longer nails? I know it definitely helps because I did grow my nails to a decent length one time and it was much easier, but I end up just cutting them because I just dont like it haha. But am I going in circles trying to improve my fingerpicking without some nail length?

Sure! It just isnā€™t widely accepted these days in classical circles. Ironically, yesterday I had the YouTube algorithms suggest this to me:

I didnā€™t watch the whole thing, because after hearing what he sounded like with no nails AND seeing how much he had to alter his technique to get what I considered an inferior (totally subjective on my end, NOT saying itā€™s bad), I didnā€™t need to go any further with my viewing :slight_smile: It may be just what youā€™re looking for though, check it out!!!

I may be misinterpreting what you mean by ā€œeasierā€, but from my fairly extensive classical experience, nails make playing MUCH harder. To get a consistent tone, each finger has to catch the string at just the right intersection of flesh/nail. The margin of error is huge because of this! And worse, nail maintenance is tedious. When the time comes to file them a little shorter, if you mess up on the length or shape, it can throw your playing off since the release (and sound) will be different from what youā€™re accustomed.

Also, we all have different goals and come from a different perspective. I was taught technique and tone production from the man who would go on to become the chair of Peabody Conservatoryā€™s guitar department. I was seriously considering becoming a professional classical guitarist so he taught me in what is considered ā€œThe Wayā€ (dogmatic as some aspects of it are). When I hear people refer to ā€œfingerpickingā€ I think Dust In The Wind and along those lines. To me, a different world than classical guitar. Not sure if you just want to play random stuff, picking with the fingers on a nylon string to have more of ā€œclassicalā€ sound, or if you want to full on Barrios piece mastery. That really matters as to what your approach with nails should be.

All that is to say, if you arenā€™t seriously planning on doing the proper classical technique and you wonā€™t be giving recitals in an un-micā€™d setting, Iā€™d forego the nails. I wish I wasnā€™t too stubborn to take my own advice. I just cannot stand the sound of a classical guitar without the nails adding some high partials to the sound lol! Plus, as I mentioned, I spent all those years on the technique with nails. The thought of learning something brand new makes me a want to have a panic attack.

1 Like

My goals for classical are simple; to just be able to pick up the nylon string and play pieces that I learn or make my own arrangements. I really just want to be fluent with using my right hand fingers to play whatever, but I greatly enjoy playing on Nylon and like learning some classical pieces from time to time to develop my music theory and song base. Wonā€™t be playing any pro classical gigs in the future haha, maybe some weddings one day but thatā€™s it. Iā€™d like to be able to sit down with a nylon and entertain people thatā€™s for sure. But itā€™s just been hard for me to develop fluidity amongst my right hand fingers and Ive been told that some nail length makes that easier because it helps with attacking the string better. Definitely going to watch that video though. Basically I just need to hear/know that I can develop strong right hand ā€œfinger pickingā€ technique for the nylon string without ever having nails. And for the record, that does not mean I need to be able to control all the tone and acoustics of my playing, at least not now hahah

Gotcha, yeah youā€™re solid with no nails Iā€™d say. There are plenty of great finger style players that donā€™t use nails. You could apply this to some ā€˜pseudoā€™ classical playing for sure.

My one takeaway from the video that I didnā€™t watch all the and recommended to you (lol) is that the guy is not ignorant and heā€™s definitely had ā€˜properā€™ training. He goes into detail about how until Segovia, plenty of classical guitarists didnā€™t use nails.

For your goals, Iā€™d go nail free. If this guy thinks heā€™s cracked it, and he seems to be happy with the sound, Iā€™d just say play close attention to the technique heā€™s using. The fact that he was letting his tip join collapse could be a key to it all. That was where for me, I was like ā€œNah eff this, I spent countless hours making sure that tip joint stayed stableā€ hahahaha

Best of luck!!!

Cool video thanks for sharing. Might even seem like itā€™s more beneficial for me to just start learning without nails so I fully develop my technique that way. Any videos you can share on how to properly practice with my right hand for classical? Itā€™s been over a year since Iā€™ve had a lesson on this and actually practiced it so I only semi-remember; I just know my fingers never really got fluid with the movements.

Nice tone here - I believe not playing with nails but I could be wrong:

I canā€™t tell from any of the shots if he has fingernails or not. I can definitely see a little thumb nail. I like the sound heā€™s getting. It is mellow, but thereā€™s clarity and a decent amount of projection. Itā€™s definitely good enough that Iā€™d say if playing that sounds like this is possible with no nails, I have no problem eating every single word Iā€™ve said/written about needing nails to play authentic classical guitar.

Though, listening to this as Iā€™m typing, there are parts where the tone brightens up so much that I feel like he has to have nails. Maybe very short nails? And heā€™s not always using them? Thatā€™s sort of like what the guy in the video I posted was saying. He kept filing his nails shorter and shorter and suddenly realized he was hardly using them.

Needs further investigation :slight_smile: Iā€™m not familiar with this guy at all. Heā€™s great though.

EDIT: Heā€™s definitely got a pinky nail:

and heā€™s got an index finger nail:

I have to conclude Iā€™m hearing nails too, at least in places, as per my initial reaction during parts of significant timbre changes.

@JakeEstner as I mentioned I donā€™t know anything about this guy. Is he known for playing without nails or something?

Iā€™ll have a look around for you. The way I was taught, it was very much something that I needed continual guidance on from my teacher. I just wasnā€™t getting it at first. Specific angles of the elbow, wrist, every joint in my finger, the contact points. Itā€™s insanity. So I needed feedback, not just seeing it done a certain way and imitating, since apparently I suck at that. Iā€™m pretty dense though. Also, itā€™s possible the technique/instruction was so rigorous because of the nails being involved. Iā€™d say as a starting point, if you like the way the guy in the video I posted sounds, use his recommendation for tone production.

1 Like

Your guess, on all of those things, is as good as mine, well, probably better as I really donā€™t have a ton of CG exposure.

So thereā€™s this thread, which I didnā€™t read all of, where I think they try to suss that out. From a skim, seems maybe some conflicting accounts: https://www.classicalguitardelcamp.com/viewtopic.php?p=1052513#p1052513

@carranoj25 the delcamp forum is pretty mammoth and I guess I donā€™t have the authority on the subject to say whether it is ā€œgoodā€ but Iā€™ve browsed for some good discussion and interesting info:

https://www.classicalguitardelcamp.com/

1 Like

Thanks. That link comes up early in the google search results lol! Iā€™d already skimmed it before watching his video and had the same feeling coming away with it. Some say he plays with nails, others seemed surprised at the notion. Thatā€™s why I was wondering if you were aware of some general assumption that the guy plays sans nails or something.

I am out of the loop in the current classical guitar community. I was heavily into from about 2000 until 2010. At this point, for the video in question Iā€™d classify my ā€œguessā€ as a pretty well educated guess. I think I hear nails in places. His tone, overall, is mellow. But plenty of players with nails have a mellow tone. Particularly if they have short nails and/or play cedar top instruments, which tend to have a darker sound in general. String choice matters a ton too. I see, without question, nails on his thumb, index and pinky fingers. The pinky doesnā€™t matter, most classical guitarists donā€™t even use it. The notion that someone (with the training this guy obviously has) would not have nails on his middle and ring fingers when obviously having them on the other 3 digits seems a little absurd to me :joy: So Iā€™m fairly certain in the video he is using nails.

I did find this though, and I think this is a good sound the guy gets. No nails:

So, again, I have no problem at this point saying someone can get a good sound without nails. I would have never considered it untilā€¦just now lol The times Iā€™ve picked up my own instrument and attempted playing it without nails, I hated the sound so much that I put it away immediately lol! Iā€™m most likely not playing it the way required with no nails. In fact, it has to be that. Without even thinking about it, when I play a single note on the classical guitar, I make contact at a very specific part of my finger. Itā€™s right were the nail meets the flesh and that never varies. Genetically speaking, my nail body comes up very far on my finger - right to the tip. So when I have ā€˜noā€™ nails, Iā€™ve still got a little bit of nail that goes past my finger tip. Anything shorter would cause bleeding lol! I bet when I play with ā€˜noā€™ nails, Iā€™m catching the short, rough part of whatā€™s left of my nail on the string and itā€™s causing a scratching sound. Thatā€™s probably why I hate it so much. The guy who successfully got a good tone with (truly) no nails is using only flesh.

For me at this point, the only question that remains is if playing with no nails would give the projection needed in a small venue, un micā€™d. That was my entire understanding (as it was taught to me) of why classical guitarists play with nails (and their technique in general). However, if weā€™re only playing classical for a hobby (I am), Iā€™d now class nails as a non-requirementā€¦except for me personally due to genetics haha!

So take that internet, democrats, and republicans (and everyone really). Thereā€™s nothing wrong with admitting a strong opinion you have/had isnā€™t totally correct. I have zero problems owning that Iā€™m wrong and learning from it. You can, in fact, get a nice sound on the classical guitar with no nails.

1 Like

Classical guitar form is definitely hard to mirror from just watching a video thatā€™s for damn sure

Iā€™ve long held the belief that itā€™s essential to be open minded, and I will not tolerate anybody trying to convince me otherwise.

1 Like

Agreed. I will never again make an absolute statement. Always shall I keep an open mind.

1 Like

Great. While I have your attention, Iā€™d like to PM you about some political opinions that are the opposite of the ones you currently hold. Similarly, I donā€™t know how you feel about carbs, astrology, or tube amps, but if I could have just a moment of your timeā€¦

1 Like

@JakeEstner lol! I think learning decent classical tone is possible without nails is enough of having my mind blown for one week. Maybe next week we can talk about that other stuff. To make it fun we should include religion. We can also flip a coin and take opposite sides of your choice of these other ā€œcontroversialā€ topics:

  • Climate Change
  • Flat Earth Theory

@carranoj25 I still havenā€™t found a nice classical guitar resource for you. I wonā€™t forget. High level though, you just need some arpeggio technique and left hand finger independence. If youā€™re just dipping your toes in that should get you 98% of the way there. I know both of those topics are covered pretty extensively in Scott Tennantā€™s ā€œPumping Nylonā€ book. Iā€™ll see if I can find a youtube series of some fundamentals.

1 Like

Awesome thanks for
Keeping me in mind! One of my old coworkers went to school for classical guitar so I might head over to his house and have him show me the deal one night this week or next. Feel like thatā€™d be the best way. Although heā€™s pretty set on needing some nail so Iā€™m just gonna make it clear that Iā€™m not looking to do the whole nylon song and dance; just need to make sure I accurately know how to pluck with my fingers and then Iā€™ll
Be clever in making it sound good haha :slight_smile:

I guess thatā€™s getting back to my original point (one of them, as I always have several, of varying importance lol). I think the technique of playing with no nails is different. I could give someone expert level advice on how to get a good sound out of the classical guitar, if they used nails (and filed/buffed them just so). I have no clue on how to advise you on all the technical aspects of getting a good tone without nails. I expect the angles would be different as would the contact points. The main motion should stay the same. Itā€™s always going to be the MCP joint that drives the movement. Where Iā€™m fuzzy is the tip joint. The Brandon Acker video I posted indicated it needed to collapse when playing without nails. Thatā€™s completely the opposite of how I was trained. I remember working so hard in the beginning to eliminate tip joint collapse. So much so that I donā€™t even think I could purposefully play that way. There may be other subtle differences beyond that.

One piece of advice I can give that I think will go a long way is to get used to the sound of a well played rest stroke. Whatever angles/positions you arrive at, it must sound good and rest strokes inherently sound better than free strokes. By that I mean with less effort. With the best technique you can get free strokes to sound so close to a rest stroke that only a small percentage of snobs will be able to hear the difference. Since it is so easy to get a good sound out of a rest stroke, even without nails, if you start there and try your best to imitate that sound with a free stroke Iā€™m sure youā€™ll get good results. I mean, who doesnā€™t want better tone? Even if youā€™re just approaching this from very much a hobbyist perspective youā€™re still going to want to maximize the sound you get from your instrument. I think that quest of the rest stroke as the benchmark will put you in the right direction.

You can have a great sound without extremely long nails. I was in the same boat as you (I used to leave my nails long and shape them with a ramp, like Zoran Dukic). Long story short I got so tired of not being able to do anything else with my right hand than playing classical guitar that i decided to cut them off. I ended up with almost no nails and Im so happy that I took action because now I can play steel string and the nails are not in the way when chuging on the electric.
What really ease my mind was learning that Ana Vidovic goes strong agianst long nails and her sound is sooooo awesome (I might be bias because she is really close to perfection imo). Another guitarrist that plays with short nails is Paul Galbraith. So yeah, you dont need long nails to be a world class perfoming classical guitarrist lol. Of course you could also go nailess. As mention, Brandon Acker and Rob Mackillop, achieve a very good sound. However in terms of looks and practicality, short nails rock!

You know, I should really read things more carefully. This made me think twice:

I read that and thought ā€œHey thatā€™s not even the question, he asked if you can play without nails!ā€

So then I read the initial post again and saw:

And

So itā€™s me who didnā€™t totally address the question. I meanā€¦I guessā€¦The title of the thread just asks if nails are necessary but your unpacking of the question might indicate you want to know if the nails need to be long. Iā€™m glad I jumped to conclusions though since the thread helped me come to the realization that itā€™s possible to get a good (subjective) sound without any nails. That was surely news to me. If your question was more about playing it with short nails, thatā€™s even easier to answer. As @pastomike65 pointed out there are worldclass players that have nails quite a bit shorter than the eagle talons we see on some. Iā€™ve never myself had long nails. For me, they ā€œclickā€ too much when they are long and I feel them catching on the strings. That could just be genetics/anatomy though.

I know Iā€™ve already beaten this dead horse but @carranoj25 if youā€™re up for having some nails it may be a little easier to get instruction, like from the friend you mentioned that studied classical.