Is it just me or it is pretty hard to bend the high E string?

Well, the title says it all :slight_smile:

I have relatively little trouble bending the B and G strings by one step, but the high E always feels like hard work - even at the 12th fret (easiest place to do a bend because the string has the most ā€œflopā€).

Currently using 9-42s on 25.5 scale guitars.

Is this normal? Do I just need to setup my guitar better? Should I give up guitar? :smiley:

(no, Iā€™m not giving up guitar donā€™t worry!)

In the Malmsteen world, thereā€™s a need to achieve a 1.5 step bend on the 21st fret fairly regularly. Using a .008 high E makes a difference for bending, unsurprisingly. But I find I need to keep extra high Es around because Iā€™ll break two or three of them inside of a single set of stringsā€™ life span. Not sure if this is useful to you but my main point is that 8s are something to consider.

1 Like

Ha, the nasty 1.5 bend!

Thereā€™s one in ā€œThe Curse of Castle Dragonā€ by Paul Gilbert, and I must have broken 10 x (high E strings) on it while trying to record my cover :smiley:

3 Likes

(Also, I never understood why YJM doesnā€™t just ask Fender to build him a 22-fret)

Well, this is a lot of fun.

I asked years ago about this and someone told me there is more tension on the outer strings, but Iā€™ve never been able to verify this.

The reality is that I can do 2-tone bends in the B and G strings but there is no way Iā€™m doing that on the high e-string. There has to be some explanation behind this beyond individual skill as it seems to be a recurring question on the internet.

In saying this, I donā€™t think you should have ā€œtroubleā€ doing 1-tone bends around the 12th fret, definitely not beyond the 12th as the string doesnā€™t have as much tension.

The gauge shouldnā€™t be a problem. 9ā€™s are widely used and considered soft.

I had a smaller scale guitar before and now I have a 25. I feel there is more tension on the high e-string than before. Iā€™ve snapped the high e-string twice in a month doing a 1.5-tone bend on the 10th fret (from d to f), which I could do before without much trouble. There must be something there, too.

Probably the 8ā€™s will help you and so will tuning down if you are in standard tuning but ultimately you should be able to do at least the 1-tone bend. Do you feel you donā€™t reach the full tone? Does it hurt? Do you ever warm up for bending exercises? (I used to do pentatonic in bends to reach the next legal note, it was good practice, but Iā€™d suggest doing the minor/major scale to avoid tendinitis).

1 Like

I have some difficulty on my more played out guitars, how are you frets looking?

1 Like

thank you all for the responses!

I can even reach the 1.5 bend but it feels like itā€™s infinitely more work than on the G and B. Yes Iā€™d say that If I had a piece with a lot of 1-tone bends on the high E itā€™d definitely hurt fairly soon.

I have to confess that I never do any traditional ā€œwarmupsā€ anymore - I just directly play the piece of music I want to play / record / practice. If that contains a bend that Iā€™m not doing properly, I may repeat it a few times and try some adjustments until it feels/sounds decent. Very often, this means that I may avoid beinding the high E string altogether, and just move stuff to the B string if possible.

Pretty poorly on pretty much all my guitars :sweat_smile: I need to get some proper setups done but Covid19 said ā€œnopeā€.

PS, I just thought about this:

Shouldnā€™t the 12th fret be the easiest to bend for all strings? My reasoning is that at the 12th you have the ā€œsame amount of stringā€ left and right of the fretted note.

1 Like

I think itā€™s always going to be more work than on the 2nd and 3rd string. Thereā€™s G.Govanā€™s bending masterclass on youtube and on his first video heā€™ll play around bending up to 3.5 tones I believe but he didnā€™t do all those extreme bends on the high e string, I think even he will recognise the limits of the strings.

Itā€™s worth trying on a different guitar just to confirm your suspicions. Just donā€™t hurt yourself.

I suppose youā€™re right but I always thought the distance between notes after the 12th fret is shorter and I feel the bending distance is shorter, too, but I may be playing this by ear so donā€™t quote me.

Good point! The physics may not be as simple as I thought :slight_smile:

The high E diggs into my fingers more because itā€™s so thin.
I find itā€™s easier to bend on my guitar with 11s. I assume itā€™s due to the pressure being more evenly distributed.

I also think that theres little room for adjustment with the high E because itā€™s right near the edge and if you fiddle to much to get a better grip it can slide off the fret. Also because theres not much fretboard behind the fingers you have to come at it at a steeper angle. Where as most the others you can get far more horizontal in angle.

Just trying to bend the other strings with a steep or more vertical angle also feels akward. So I think that might be the main issue?

1 Like

I think if youā€™re having trouble, itā€™s likely more to do with this than other factors. It probably means you donā€™t get to push the string with the same area of your fingertip that you do for other strings.

And the distance from the string to the edge of the fingerboard isnā€™t necessarily the same with every guitar design. And occasionaly, small variances in manufacturing can result in either the bridge not being ideally positioned, or the neck not being aligned perfectly in the neck pocket. I know Iā€™ve picked up some guitars in a music store that had less fretboard ā€œmarginā€ than others.

The first thing I do when I try out a guitar Iā€™m thinking about buying is put it under my chin like a violin (not completely literally, but that gives you the basic idea) to see how the strings and the edges of the fingerboard line up.

Position of the nut or the nut slots could be another variable, but it seems like that would be harder to get wrong unless somebody is cutting the nut slots by hand.

In any event, on a guitar you own, you could experiment with either slightly changing the position of the nut, or using a narrower-spaced nut to see if that makes you happier. Some bridges allow you to adjust the spacing at the bridge, but I think most of them have the saddles lined up in ā€œgroovesā€ now. Depending on the bridge design, it might be reasonable to swap in another bridge with narrower spacing.

Before modding your gutiar, the simple non-pandemic way to test whether some guitars bend easier for you than others would be to go to a music store and try doing bends on a bunch of different guitars to see if you have the same difficulty on all of them. String gauge is a potential variable there too (though I think 9s are pretty standard on strat-like guitars at least), but you should also be able to visually inspect the amount of fingerboard margin.

1 Like

Just never bend and slide instead, problem solved.

But seriously, does it feel like it hurts or it physically hard?

2 Likes

Abstract:
The physics seems pretty straightforward to me.

Analysis:
The tension of a guitar string is a function of length L (inches), weight per linear distance W (lbs/inch), and frequency (Hz): T = 4*W*L^2*F^2/386.4 = S*F^2, with S being roughly constant for a given string and fret [1]. (Iā€™ll ignore the small change in length that comes from bending and fretting, and focus on tension as the dominant variable.) Then the force required for bending is dT = 2T*dF/F. Since dF = F*(2^(n/12) - 1) for bends of n half-steps, we get dT = 2T*(2^(n/12) - 1), meaning that the force required to bend a given interval is proportional to the tension of the unbent string. I donā€™t think the bending distance (lateral deviation of the string) matters too much as far as effort is concerned.

The tension of each string is often published by the manufacturers. A quick scan of several manufacturersā€™ tables for various gauges [2,3,4,5] indicates that there are no hard and fast rules about which strings have the highest tension, but Dā€™Addario EXL120ā€™s at 25.5" and standard tuning look like this:

image

The force felt on the fingertips is just the along-string component of dT, so 2*dT*sin(alpha) where alpha is the angle in radians between the bent and unbent string. The factor of two is because we are increasing the tension on both sides of the string (11th fret to nut and 12th fret to bridge) and those two lengths are almost equal.

When we move away from the 12th fret, our approximation for the force felt on our fingertips becomes dT*(alpha + tan(beta)). When weā€™re close to the nut, the angle at the nut end (beta) is larger than alpha and the tangent term dominates. Closer to the bridge, the opposite is true. So jlopez is correct, the higher up the neck you go, the less force is required for the same amount of pitch change. This effect is pretty consistent across strings. So it remains true that the amount of force required to bend a string is proportional to the unbent tension of the string.

Weā€™re assuming a double-locking nut for simplicity. If the nut or bridge allows the string to slide, then the distance required for bending to a given pitch will increase, though the force wonā€™t be too affected, and our results will still hold.

Discussion:
While itā€™s true in these results that the high-E string does take more force to bend than the B-string, the G-string takes even more force, and the lower strings take even more than that, since itā€™s all just dependent on the unbent tension, but I always find that the thicker strings give much more pitch response for a given amount of bending ā€˜effortā€™. I assume this is because thicker strings give lower pressure due to greater surface area contact with your fingertip. There also may be a psychological effect: thicker strings seem to sustain longer and I think I end up squeezing thinner strings harder when I bend in a misguided attempt to get more sustain from them. I also tend to agree with the leverage arguments mentioned above. Technique seems to matter, too. Bending with forearm rotation rather than finger extension makes a lot of difference in terms of how hard it feels like Iā€™m working for a bend.

Also, if you can bend hard enough to break your strings, then it doesnā€™t seem like force is the limiting factor.

Conclusion:
None to speak of. The reason bending is harder at low frets is explained, but the reason the high E string feels more difficult to bend is still just a guess. This was fun, though.

Also:

Oops. Sorry.

References

  1. https://www.liutaiomottola.com/formulae/tension.htm
  2. http://www.millbrook.fi/doc/kielisoittimet/GHS-Tension-Charts-By-String-Type.pdf
  3. http://web.daddario.com/StringTensionPro/Search#
  4. https://www.elixirstrings.com/support/string-tension-for-tuning-guitar
  5. https://i.imgur.com/rms49Hh.jpg
1 Like

Dear @induction, many thanks for choosing our journal.

While the science in your manuscript appears solid, we are puzzled by your choice of units. What are there inches/lbs that you speak of? :smiley:

Until your manuscript is converted into SI units, I am afraid we wonā€™t be able to process it further.

Sincerely,

Jimi Pickslanto,
Editor in Chief
Physica Guitarristica Scripta

Jokes aside that was a great post, thank you :slight_smile:

1 Like

Pretty straightforward.

Amazing level of detail in that answer, mate, thanks for the input. But to the layman the word straightforward has a different meaning!

This may well be true on paper but I can easily bend the G-string 1.5 tones or more without as much effort or fear of breaking the string. So tension might be a smaller factor than we give it credit for.

Loved the sense of humour! Keep it up.

2 Likes

Not sure how helpful I can be but hereā€™s my experienceā€¦ back when I was into SRV there was a tune where I broke a few high E strings on the same lick at the fret on the same day! I think by the 4th string the issue went away, this was a while ago but I suspect I changed my technique from holding the sting down and sliding to just pushing the string up from under. Now Iā€™m on a YJM strat and the scallops make it a non-issue, but again with the scallops, itā€™s even easier to apply more pressure along the fret then down onto the fret, granted at all times Iā€™ve tuned a half step down. Iā€™m travelling and donā€™t have my guitars with me, so this is really me just thinking about it.

Think itā€™s just judo, apply pressure at the right points :slight_smile:
edit: and vector I should say!

1 Like

This is interesting, Iā€™ve noticed I often bend and even vibrato with my thumb not touching the neck. I guess Iā€™m using more forearm rotation (edit: more of an up and down motion than rotation) ! Never thought about it, but I suspected itā€™s something I had to look into eventually. Great post!

1 Like

Iā€™ve broken a couple of strings by pinching the string against the edge of a fret while bending. Apparently itā€™s quite usual to pull down the string a bit right before the bend comes and it is possible this is responsible for a lot of the breaks.

2 Likes

Cool replies all! I never realised how scalloped frets could allow you to get the fingers in a better position for pushing/pulling the string. Makes sense!

Also @jllopez you were totally right, bending feels easier in the higher frets (beyond the 12th). So my initial theory (just looking at string length on both sides) was definitely wrong / oversimplified.

This is an interesting question @Pepepicks66! I paid more attention to it and the real problem is not the force I need to apply, but the fact that I feel like my nails start to want to separate from the skin of the finger - if that makes sense? Again, with 1-tone bends this is only a problem on the high E.

The angle with which my fingers approach the string may definitely be a factor!

2 Likes

Yep, high-E is hard to bend for me. In most data Iā€™ve seen E and G strings have more or less similar tension (B-string usually has lower tension). which is interesting.
Iā€™ve just tried to do a whole tone bend on both strings, and results are as follows:

  • on a G string I have to move it ~0.5 inch
  • on a E string I have to move it almost 1 inch.

Basically, the angle neccesary to change the pitch depends on many factors, such as tesnion force, Youngā€™s modulus, and cross-section etc. While tension force and Youngā€™s modulus for E and G strings are more or less similar, cross sections are not.

Letā€™s take a simple formula:
cos phi ā‰ˆ (Tk^2 - EA) / (T - EA),
where phi - angle neccesary to make a bend,
T - tension force,
E - Youngā€™s modulus for a string
A - string crosssection
k - koefficient of frequency change (ā‰ˆ1.122 times for a wholetone)

I use 0.009 vs 0.016 strings as reference string diameters. I assumed tension and Youngā€™s modulus for both strings similar (60N and 170GPa respectively).

For this data I get angles ~3.8Ā° and ~2.2Ā°, i.e. E-string requires more angle to achieve the same bending (theoretically). For a 650mm guitar scale-length it gives us:
325tan(3.8) ā‰ˆ 21.6mm shift
325
tan(2.2) ā‰ˆ 12.5mm shift.

(325mm for a 12th fret which is half of scale-length)

Though I used a lot of simplifications the result is in agreement with my experiment and my overall feelings ))

3 Likes