Yeah this has been a lick that’s haunted me too. I can’t really understand how such a complicated lick could become somewhat of a staple lick among the big blues guitarist of the old days. I’ve always struggled with it as well and can still not play it properly without it feeling wonky.
So I have a few options, if it’s ok to somewhat change the lick. In the video below I show all three versions in order.
Version 1. This is my go to where I get rid of the second note and go for aggression of the other notes instead. So I’m using USX through out all these licks. What’s important in this version is that the bent note is twice as long as the other notes and that the note on the E string is an upstroke. The rest is just alternating.
(e)-------------------------10---------------------
(b)------------------------------13–10-------
(g)------b12 (14)---------------------------------
Version 2. Here all the notes of the original lick are played but I use a downward sweep for the first three, and legato for the two last. To be clear, this means that the first note of the B string is a “hammer on from nowhere”. First note is still twice as long as the other. This is a much smoother sounding lick in general.
(e)------------------------------10---------------------
(b)------------------------10---------h13-p10-------
(g)------b12 (14)---------------------------------
Version 3. This is a version I just came up with so I haven’t burnt this in and it doesn’t feel totally smooth yet. It’s a combination of the two versions above and adds a doubled note on the E string to keep USX motion. So the first three notes are swept like version 2 with the exception that the first note are now just as long as all the other notes to keep the triplet feel going. The last three are alternate picked exactly like version 1.
(e)-------------------------10–10--------------------
(b)-------------------10--------------13–10-------
(g)------b12 (14)---------------------------------
Hope this is of any help.