Well I would be a little cautious there too. I wouldn’t really think too much about the intellectual aspects of it, and how many options there are to employ, more so worry about the fundamental picture of “does it work for me”, and “can I stick with it consistently enough to develop it”. To me these things are better for retrospective analysis. I get that some people really love the cookbook approach to things, and it is attractive to think that if I put everything together in an exact formulation i’m guaranteed to get the desired result systematically.
Also I think the wording of no tension is a bit off too, and I admit in my younger days people using this description threw me off, because this is a very relative thing. I don’t think there is ever “no” tension, there always some, just not a laborious amount.